Assignment #2 - illustration

Due Thursday, April 28 (in class)

CS 99D - The Science of Art
Winter Quarter, 2005
Marc Levoy
Handout #5

Your second assignment is to write a 3-4 page double-spaced paper on one of the topics listed in the first section below. Alternatively, you may do one of the projects listed in the second section. You may also choose another topic or project if you clear it with me in advance. The format and rules for this assignment are the same as in the first one. Don't forget to cite your sources using footnotes and/or a list of references, as appropriate.

Writing projects

• What does Thomas Kuhn think of puzzle-solvers? Can one talk about aesthetics or taste in scientific work? If so, then what is society's current taste? Do we prefer puzzle-solvers or paradigm-breakers? Defend your thesis. Finally, what is your preference, and why?
  
  
• Kuhn compares scientists operating within a paradigm to tradespeople (p. 43). The Renaissance lifted artists out of the ranks of tradespeople, making them heroes. Is such a transformation possible within the confines of "normal science"? Is it desireable?
  
  
• Compare revolution in science with revolution in art. Are there paradigms? Are there revolutions? Are there equivalents of "normal science" and "extraordinary science"? If one focuses on illusionistic art, do your answers change?
  
  
• Leonardo, in the sections of On Painting devoted to the human body, gives advice on nearly every aspect of the depiction of people in paintings. How dependent is this advice on the artistic tastes of the Renaissance? His advice on draperies is obviously less relevant now than when he wrote it. How about his advice on pose? On expression? On proportion?
  
  
• Among the many genres of illustration, we considered only a few in class: anatomy and landscape. Trace the historical development of a genre that we did not cover. Examples are botanical illustration, zoological illustration, engineering drawings, mathematical diagrams, the visualization of economic or demographic data, or mapmapping. Within your chosen genre, try to move beyond merely cataloguing the highlights of its history. What are the special problems of illustrating your chosen object? How have illustrators addressed the questions of generic versus specific, and of diagrammatic versus naturalistic? What are the abstractions they employ, and how have these changed over time? For ideas, look at Ford's Images of Science, Stafford's Artful Science, or Tufte's The Visual Display of Quantitative Information.

Some non-writing projects

• Create one or more illustrations, either by hand or using a computer, that conveys in abstracted form some poorly understood aspect of Stanford University or the Stanford campus. For example, if you like maps, make a series that depicts the density of bicycle traffic and bicycle parking throughout the campus, or the point-to-point transit paths taken by students at different hours of the day. This will require some empirical data gathering on your part. It's also a chance to be creative. Look at Tufte's beautiful books on data visualization, especially the classic The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, for inspiration.
  
  
• Create one or a series of illustrations, either by hand or using a computer, that depict either a set of scientific principles or the salient abstract properties of a collection of objects. Scientific American is famous for its abstract illustrations of scientific phenomena. National Geographic or TIME magazine often use graphics to explain complex scientific or engineering processes, but their diagrams are often long on drama and short on information. Did you learn something inspiring in physics last week? Can you make a better explanation of it than the one in your textbook? Think hard about what principle you want to convey, how to abstract it from the observed object, and what pictorial device to use in depicting the abstraction. I am more interested in cleverness and originality than in technical virtuosity. If you have any doubts about whether an idea of yours fits these requirements, come talk to me.

For the two projects listed above, your submission should include a textual explanation describing how you arrived at your abstraction(s), and how you chose the pictorial device(s) you did.